ࡱ> qsp RbjbjVV 4r<<JjjL 4-54AAAAA   4444444$a7:Z4     4AA4~!~!~! vAA4~! 4~!~!0|02AЋQ X1440-5j1]:8!F]:$02]:02h  ~!     44~!   -5    ]:         j s: Academic Senate Meeting December 7, 2010 Minutes Attendance Virgil Adams, Mary Adler, Julia Balen, Frank Barajas, Michael Berman, Andrzej Bieszczad, Elizabeth Bingham, Bob Bleicher, Geoffrey Buhl, Susanne Bruggen, Catherine Burriss, Manuel Correia, Nancy Deans, Colleen Delaney-Rivera, Dennis Downey, Therese Eyermann, Jeanne Grier, Andrea Grove, Ivona Grzegorczyk, Phillip Hampton, Beth Hartung, Nicole Ipach, Tiina Itkonen, Antonio Jimenez-Jimenez, Jacquelyn Kilpatrick, Kristen LaBonte, Daniel Lee, Alex McNeill, Jim Meriwether, Brad Monsma, Andrew Morris, Dennis Muraoka, Dawn Neuman, Jack Reilly, Paul Rivera, Tom Schmidhauser, Sadiq Shah, Peter Smith, Stephen Stratton, Judy Swanson, Kaia Tollefson, Elnora Tayag, Billy Wagner, Daniel Wakelee, Greg Wood, Cindy Wyels. Approval of the Agenda -Agenda amended to discuss SP 10-04 MS Coastal Sustainability first. -m/s- J. Balen, and P. Rivera, approved as amended. Approval of Minutes of November 16, 2010 -M/S-B. Bleicher, T. Itkonen, approved. Intent to Raise Question In response to D. Downeys question regarding the Turkey Shoot, Caroline Doll sent out an email to the campus community on November 19th, updating everyone on the development plans for the University Park. In response to N. Parmars question about the speeding limit on Los Angeles Ave, Chief Reed replied that the speeding limit throughout the campus is 20 miles per hour. New Questions T. Itkonen asked her annual question about electric carts being able to deliver faculty to the second roundabout at night. N. Parmar would like to know if the electric carts used to escort students can have windshield wipers installed. N. Parmar also asked if there were any composting bins on campus. Report from the Provost -Provost Neuman asked everyone to submit a list of everything they are doing to assist students with graduating to Jacque Kilpatrick, who is working on the Graduation Initiative project. -Teaching and Learning with Technology Project: Have hired a consultant, Michelle Brock, who will provide information about teaching online and kinds of technology available. Current plan is that we will have funding for developing the Teaching and Learning with Technology project through course release. -Please join us for another conversation on the Master Plan on January 21, where they will be discussing living and learning communities and will be providing models of best practices. -The budget allocation the year is less than in previous years. -Budget update: Although 2010-2011 budget has been partially restored, were still below past budget (which remains at 2005-2006 level). There is discussion that the governor may rescind the fund increase; if this does not happen student fees will increase. Provost Neuman invites faculty to stop by her office any time to see the budget. Report from the Senate Chair: None Report from the Statewide Senators -B. Wagner shared information he had received regarding the budget, reading from a statement from the Senate Committee on Fiscal Affairs: Size of budget problem is so large that lawmaker need to consider reduction in every area of state expenditures, including governers package such as appropriations for universities and courts. Wagner noted that the next Statewide Senate meeting is the week before classes begin in January 2011. First reading item SP 10-06 Retreat Rights for MPPs -m/s, P. Rivera, C. Burriss. V. Adams gave a brief background of the policy indicating it was timely because we are scheduled to hire several administrators in the upcoming months. -P. Rivera had a few comments: 1. He feels that the way the policy is written appears to preclude the possibility that an administrator might retreat to faculty without tenure; he would prefer it discuss rank and tenure, allowing for the possibility for an MPP to retreat to faculty a an untenured associate. 2. The language recommends tenure upon appointment; he would feel more comfortable if it said granted tenure upon retreat to faculty. 3. If there is a lack of consensus can it instead read that it will be a majority of faculty vote. -D. Muraoka asked when the retreat rights conversation should take place. Should it happen during the hiring process or should the President only discuss it with selected candidates? -V. Adams understands it to be a conversation that would occur when a particular individual is selected. -J. Grier noted that when going through a search process for an MPP we view them as an administrator without enough information about how they would fit in as faculty. There are different questions to ask when considering a candidate for faculty. Would we put everyone through an interdisciplinary process? -J. Meriwether said this policy applies to the point in time when a hire is taking place, at that particular point in time. After the hire has taken place this would not apply. -B. Hartung asked who would be willing to come into a new system without retreat rights, noting that this is a recruiting issue. -Provost Neuman reminded everyone that CFA has a clear statement about the right of faculty to evaluate somebody for tenure in relation to retreat rights. -M. Berman shared that when he interviewed at Cal Poly Pomona he was asked if he wanted retreat rights and in order to receive them, he had to interview separately with the department and then the President would receive a recommendation from the department. -AJ Bieszczad said the whole process is flawed. Programs are not allowed to hire regular faculty, yet now we are asking the program to make a decision. Why would we hire for the same position using two different processes? -I. Grzegorczyk agrees with P. Rivera and wonders if it would be a possible to hire someone and give them tenure even though they are not qualified as Associate Professors and have never done research in the past. She does not feel tenure should be offered right away but should instead be earned over the course of their work here. What happens if we hire an administrator whose background does not match any of the programs we currently have at the University? -Provost Neuman says the position announcement usually says eligibility for appointment as full professor with tenure. The intent of this policy is that the c.v. is passed to the unit and the unit gets to meet with the candidate, allowing for faculty input and recommendation. She added that the President is reluctant to give tenure to anyone that has not already had it at a previous institution. Second Reading Items SP 10-03 Academic Master Plan -E. Tayag explained the recommended changes which were identified in red. -I. Grzegorczyk asked for clarification on the three asterisks located after the BS in Computer Engineering, what do they mean? Who has to raise the funds and how many funds need to be raised? She also expressed concern that the Master Plan as presented does not have much development in the STEM disciplines. She would like to see more programs in the STEM areas. I. Grzegorczyk made a motion to add new programs to the Master Plan. Chair Hartung ruled it out of order because there is already a process that delineates how new programs are to be recommended. -E. Tayag explained the short form process that is to be used in order to recommend a new program. -A.J. Bieszczad made a motion to remove the three asterisks behind the MS in Engineering and Nursing Program. He said the presence of those triple asterisks suggests a lesser status for some programs than others. Motion seconded by I. Grzegorczyk. -P. Hampton reminded everyone that The Master Plan was approved last year with the three asterisks. -M. Adler said she was on the Academic Planning Committee that produced The Master Plan and she clarified the reasoning for the asterisks was that certain programs required additional infrastructure and resources and due to the budget cuts, they were unsure the campus would be able to support the programs. -G. Buhl commented that initially he felt the three asterisks should be removed but now he thinks all programs should have the asterisks because they are all dependent on funding. -The Provost gave examples of the differences between programs that will require additional funding and infrastructure vs. programs that do not require as much in the way of resources/infrastructure. -P. Hampton explained that The Master Plan had two types of programs, state funded and non-state funded and then explained how the Academic Planning Committee reviewed the resource requirements for each of the programs. He explained that the triple asterisk notation was added to allow programs that could not advance through either stateside or self support avenues to proceed with finding other funding sources (e.g., writing grants, working with the Foundation, finding other external funding). He stated that removing the triple asterisk would do a disservice to what the APC does; wed be defeating the original proposal, of need for additional resources. -A.J. Bieszczad feels that it is unacceptable for some programs to have the stigma of requiring additional funding from the beginning, adding that this means we cannot generate funds under state support in some programs. He stated that this is a philosophical discussion about how we go about program planning at this university, and noted again that it is unacceptable to single out certain fields that will not be supported by the university. I. Grzegorczyk would like to know how it is determined that Anthropology is less expensive than Computer Engineering? Who determines that Computer Engineering has to raise the funds while Anthropology does not? How much money is needed? She asked for clarification about what we are approving. Are we approving fund getting? If so, how much? Who does it. She noted that the sciences are generally more expensive, but we need the sciences to help the economy of Ventura County. -Chair Hartung reminded everyone that the motion on the floor was to strike the three asterisks. -Provost Neuman asked how the program was presented in the first place? Was it initially presented with the funding caveat? She opposes starting programs without resources. Vote taken on the amendment to strike the three asterisks: Yes: 4 No: 21 Abstain: 10 Amendment failed -J. Meriwether requested clarification on what would happen to the Health Science Degree since it was tabled. He also noted that moving the program from state side to self support was a fundamental shift so he requested clarification on what was being voted on. -P. Hampton explained that what was tabled was the long form for Health Science, which would be completed over the winter break; then we can discuss Health Science as long form. We are asking to move from state side to extended university with AMP. If approved by the Senate, it will then move forward to the Chancellors Office. -S. Stratton clarified that the short form had already been approved and placed the program on the AMP; this would not affect the programs location on the AMP. He explained that we just saw the short form for Coastal Sustainability, and have already seen the short form for Health Science. If its being moved, its just a matter of shifting it. Once it leaves here it has to go to the Chancellors Office and WASC. -J. Meriwether disagreed with this explanation. He said that when tabled, any discussion of a BS in Health Sciences, including moving it from state side to self support, was also tabled. Because of the tabling, that BS in Health Science is still state side. If this is not the case, he asked to reopen the discussion of whether we want to move the BS to elf support. -S. Stratton said we dont have to accept or reject the piece as a whole; we can make amendment. The long form is not connected to whether it is on state side or not. -J. Meriwether clarified that the understanding is that we are approving the shift of this BS to self support. B. Hartung affirmed that understanding, adding that we have discussed and approved the short form. -D. Muraoka offered a point of information on the Short and Long Form process and the implementation process. He clarified the Long Form puts the programs on the CSU Master Plan and the Short Form is just for our campus use. -C. Wyels said Ching Hua Wang was surprised to hear the program was moving to self-support, and asked when that was decided and why. -A.J. Bieszczad said that from the beginning C. Wang said it was supposed to be Extended University. -P. Hampton said he had expressed concern to C. Wang about moving from state side to Extended University; she had been unaware. -B. Wagner was involved in the planning as well and he understood it to be a degree completion program in Extended University for students who did not get into the Nursing program. -P. Rivera asked if the location of program, state side or Extended University, is included in the information submitted to Chancellors Office. D. Muraoka replied that we are allowed to implement on this campus as we have resources and choose to do; he believes the location of program is reported to Chancellors Office. -J. Meriwether is uncomfortable with shifting the program to self support without further discussion. -J. Meriwether moved to keep it stateside as currently proposed, seconded by P. Hampton. -G. Buhl asked if it were true that the program was in state support at one point. P. Hampton indicated that it was, slated for 2012. J. Meriwether agreed, stating that in the current AMP, the one approved last time, had the program in state side. The version were looking at now says self support. -A.J. Bieszczad and B. Wagner reminded everyone that the initial plan for this program was for it to be a self-support program. B. Wagner added that the reason for the change is because we havent been able to grow. Health Sciences represents 1000 students, over a quarter of all of our stduents. The only way for this to feasibly go forward is to put it through self support. -G. Buhl spoke against the motion because he is concerned it might lessen the chance of it being approved due to the lack of resources on the stateside. He does not think this motion is good for the AMP because it creates an AMP we cannot actually do. -J. Balen clarified that there are so many students interested in the program that if it was offered stateside we would not be able to accept them all, versus if the program were self support. She believes that placing the BS in Health Sciences where it is on the current version of the AMP gives students access to something they want when we really need it. -P. Hampton is not sure about the data on students who do not make it into the Nursing program and how many of them would then enroll through Extended Education due to the cost of the program. He suggested that if this resolution passes, when the long form is discussed and approved this program would get an asterisk from the Provosts office (i.e., requires resources to implement). He stated that he has concerns about criteria by which programs are put on Extended University. Extended University will not solve the problem of a low degree completion rate. -J. Meriwether stated his support of this BS, and added that he would like to have more information about resources before seeing a shift from state side. -T. Itkonen would feel more comfortable with Ching-Hua Wang here for the conversation; she would prefer to wait until February to vote on this. -E. Tayag reminded everyone that the other programs still needed to be passed prior to being sent to the Chancellors Office. B. Hartung added that the Senate can decide to vote as it sees fit, but its a time sensitive issue. I. Grzegorczyk does not see the problem with voting on this today and then revisiting this again in the Spring. -B. Wagner pointed out that once a degree is created in Extended Education, it can always be moved stateside but it does not work the opposite way. -A. Jimenez-Jimenez pointed out that we needed an explanation about the three asterisks and what competing programs will be approved first, second, third and who decides that? Vote taken by show of hands on the motion to amend the AMP to move the BS in Health Science to Stateside support. Yes: 4 No: 23 Abstain: 7 Motion failed Vote taken on Policy SP 10-03 Yes: 22 No: 5 Abstain: 6 Motion Passed SP 10-04 Short Form: Coastal Sustainability MS -P. Rivera asked D. Rodriguez for specifics regarding the workload associated with the mentoring plan. -D. Rodriguez stated that student acceptance into the program would be contingent upon them being placed in the field first. The employers would then become the professional mentors for these students. -I. Grzegorczyk clarified that this program is to be self support, and asked if there were plans to move it to state side in future. AJ Bieszczad replied there are no plans for any of the programs to move state side at this time. -C. Delaney-Rivera inquired about the reasoning for the differing number of students on different years (number of students expected versus revenue stream projections dont match up). D. Rodriguez replied that he relied on Gary Bergs recommendations, and the ultimate goal is a 20-member cohort. Vote taken by show of hands Yes: 33 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Passed Unanimously SP 10-05 Health Science BS (Long Form) -B. Wagner made a motion to table the vote on this until the next Senate meeting because S. Lefevre would like to work on it further. I. Grzegorczyk seconded the motion. Vote taken on the motion to table the vote Yes: 35 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Passed Unanimously VISTAS Grant Presentation -K. Tollefson gave a presentation on the program which is designed to attract additional Hispanic students to post-graduate programs. She supplied demographic information and the program goals which are; to increase enrollment, provide graduate student services, faculty development, professional connection and to promote affordability and access through financial aid and distance learning. I. Grzegorczyk added that support would be available for graduate students from any major. Reports from Standing Committees Committee on Committees -No Report Committee on Centers and Institutes -No Report Curriculum Committee -P. Hampton reviewed all the work theyd done over the semester via The Twelve Days of Curriculum and actually succeeded in leading the group to sing acapella. -New Curriculum items need to be submitted no later than April 15, 2011. Faculty Affairs Committee -No Report Fiscal Policies -No Report General Education -No Report Student Academic Policies and Procedures -No Report Professional Leave Committee -No Report Reports from Other Committees/Centers on Campus -A. Jimenez-Jimenez reported three faculty members had applied to be Resident Directors in other countries; Terry Ballman (Spain), Irina Costache (Italy), and Nian-Sheng Huang (China). Announcements -C. Wyels reported that all lottery requests were funded and there is still some money left to send students to conferences. Adjourn -4:22 pm 12<=      ' / b    C 㜒~tplbXTPhgG*h/*h/*h5>*h/*h/*5>*hhjyhhhh5>*h,bhhChhhhhS5>*hh5>*h^h^PJ^J_Hh^B*PJ^J_Hph!h^h^B*PJ^J_Hphh^hS5>* h^5>*hShh5CJ aJ hhS5CJ aJ )12=   d  } x^gdy & FgdYEgdYE & FgdY"L & Fgd/*$a$gd^$a$gdC E M t   # % P e } vwxLY]n{վٔ} h'F5>*h_"h-RKhMh d6h dhhMhT>hkhkha}5>*hyh DhYEhYEhYE>* hhY"LhhY"L6hY"Lha}hh/*H* hh/*h/*h/*H*huh/*h1{23V   A>q"?C"!!!!"+-23V    A^0:FLMq+_` de>>L ûͯկѯѯѯѧ՗яh}7hNBh h|%}hKh0VhOZhvh_"h4Ph HhGThGTh1I>*h1Ih1I5>*h1Ih;Uhha}ha}ha}5>* h'Fh'Fh'F h'F5h'Fh'F56 ?C"[m k u !X!`!!!!!!!"""#6#:#m#n#p#q#### $&$7$8$$%v%%%º̶̲hScyhh hhLhvHhth4hAQDh3h7 h oh oh{>*h{h{5>*h{hdhOhy h;_hMh gnhy fh|hphGhNBhMn6"q#8$$%%-''(@+,.>//'0/070C0T0[12F45\6/7888}93:%%%%%@&O&-'''(((()?+@++,,4--..=/>/////0'0+0,0.02060?0B0C0T0000#1&1Z1[12 3 3F3E4F4U4-7/7ĸįīīģh^hhrBjhwvhwvh>tL>*h>tLhO h>tL>*hO hO >*hHhO hkah>Dz,6>c?o?u???G@@?A@ApAAB CpCqC DaDbDDEEEEFGGG G6G7G8GRGļhRhd>*hdhbLh hg|h hh/h%vh7h;IhPh9GMhhqhKWhB0ghMh#}h>ٳbı4<=3:v;;7<c=>?@AqC DDEEF8GGGGGGGGHHHHNHHIgdg|gdqRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHNHOHHH3ILI~III JJfJgJJJKaKKKKKKȼĴİĬ}y}}u}h0hq&hUhkB*PJ^J_Hph!h^hkB*PJ^J_HphhkhjhEhc]he{he{hC>*hChC5hChhd hhdhhdhhdhhd>* hd5 h5 hR5hhdhRhd>* h>*-IgJKKKKKKKLZLLLLLLMMMNOO'O?OJOnOyOO0PyPgdg|KKKLYLZLLLLLLLLMMMMMMMMMMMNNO'O?OIOJOnOxOyOOO/P0PEPJPKP[PyPPŽߟ㟱{w{w{oh{h{>*h{hM6h;_h{h{h;_>*h;_h;_5hqbhE6h>hqXh>h;15>*h;1hqXh "M5hqXh`5h`hk>* hk>* h`>*h`h`>*hkh hYFhYFhU>*hUhUhU5+yPPPPPPPP Q'Q2Q3QcQRR,RRRRRgd[gdg|PPPPPPPPP Q'Q3QbQcQyQQQQQRRRRR,RRRRRR hhdhj% hj% hj% 5>*hj% hz.hz.5>*hE6hz.h[h`5>*h[h[5>*h[h`>*h[h[>*h[h[h{>*h{h{>*h{21h:pa/ =!"#`$% j, 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH @`@ ENormalCJ_H aJmH sH tH j j E Heading 1$<@&.5CJ KH OJPJQJ\_HaJ mHsHtHl l E Heading 2$<@&056CJOJPJQJ\]_HaJmHsHtHf f E Heading 3$<@&*5CJOJPJQJ\_HaJmHsHtHZ Z E Heading 4$<@&5CJ\_HaJmHsHtH^ ^ E Heading 5 <@&$56CJ\]_HaJmHsHtHX X E Heading 6 <@&5CJ\_HaJmHsHtHJ J E Heading 7 <@&_HmHsHtHP P E Heading 8 <@&6]_HmHsHtH^ ^ E Heading 9 <@&$CJOJPJQJ_HaJmHsHtHDA D Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List R/R EHeading 1 Char5CJ KH OJPJQJ\aJ T/T EHeading 2 Char 56CJOJPJQJ\]aJN/N EHeading 3 Char5CJOJPJQJ\aJB/!B EHeading 4 Char5CJ\aJH/1H EHeading 5 Char56CJ\]aJ:/A: EHeading 6 Char5\</Q< EHeading 7 CharCJaJB/aB EHeading 8 Char6CJ]aJ@/q@  EHeading 9 Char OJPJQJb> b ETitle<@&a$.5CJ KHOJPJQJ\_HaJ mHsHtHJ/J E Title Char5CJ KHOJPJQJ\aJ RJ R ESubtitle <@&a$OJPJQJ_HmHsHtHF/F E Subtitle CharCJOJPJQJaJ*W * E`Strong5\:X : E@Emphasis56OJQJ]44 E No SpacingaJ TT E Colorful List - Accent 1 ^m$` ` !EColorful Grid - Accent 1 6_HmHsHtH^/^ EColorful Grid - Accent 1 Char 6CJaJn n #ELight Shading - Accent 2 "]^56_HaJmHsHtH\/1\ "ELight Shading - Accent 2 Char 56CJB/AB E0Subtle Emphasis 6B*phZZZJ/QJ EPIntense Emphasis56>*CJaJD/aD ESubtle Reference >*CJaJD/qD EIntense Reference 5>*CJF/F E Book Title56CJOJPJQJaJ66 Ep TOC Heading)@& T T +0 Balloon Text* CJOJQJ^JaJmHsHtHR/R *0Balloon Text CharCJOJQJ^J_H aJPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] J rC  %/7RGKPR*,./12468"3:IyPR+-03578@0(  B S  ?(\ f 0%0&0)066&H.HJ A ]  D&T&^&a&''==8??BC:FFFJ3333333333333=}pJJJ8P/&nRL71)t9S$Xb#\:*nCYc4* ^`OJQJo( 8^8`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o  p^ `OJQJo(  @ ^ `OJQJo( x^x`OJQJo(H^H`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJPJQJ^Jo(-^`OJQJ^Jo(hHop^p`OJQJo(hH@ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoP^P`OJQJo(hH ^`OJPJQJ^Jo(-^`OJQJ^Jo(hHop^p`OJQJo(hH@ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoP^P`OJQJo(hH ^`OJPJQJ^Jo(-^`OJQJ^Jo(hHop^p`OJQJo(hH@ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoP^P`OJQJo(hH ^`OJPJQJ^Jo(-^`OJQJ^Jo(hHop^p`OJQJo(hH@ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoP^P`OJQJo(hH ^`OJPJQJ^Jo(-^`OJQJ^Jo(hHop^p`OJQJo(hH@ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoP^P`OJQJo(hHCYcXb#\L71/&)t9SeF        "        \u        rh        ,fE        ;_H  jc_"y 7 j% O pGv;_c]du  o/*gG*3E6M6}7T>,?@A]KA DAQDYE'FYF H;I1I-RKY"L>tLM "M9GMbM O4Pq&NB*t/g|z[ ;17GT$Bw`e\EyCvH{dbL4KkP3ELM#U^ Mn a 4<HOOSR{,kqonBz.0KWkaatwv>\JJ@GJ`@Unknown G*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx Arial7.@ Calibri7K@CambriaO PLucida GrandeArial?= *Cx Courier New;WingdingsA BCambria Math"1hes&es&' ?&' ?&!`20JJ3QHX $PS2!xx Windows User Windows User$      Oh+'0, px   $Windows User Normal.dotmWindows User2Microsoft Office Word@F#@fO@fO' ?՜.+,0 hp  91Ƶ&J  Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789;<=>?@ACDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_abcdefgijklmnorRoot Entry FQtData :1TableB:WordDocument4rSummaryInformation(`DocumentSummaryInformation8hCompObjy  F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q